Skip to Main Content
phone logo
Call us for FREE Consultation (404) 418-8507 We don't get paid unless we win for you.

Can Tesla be held liable for a car accident caused by the Autopilot?

The advent of autonomous and semi-autonomous driving technology has revolutionized the automotive industry, bringing both incredible advancements and complex legal questions. One of the most high-profile examples is Tesla’s Autopilot, a driver assistance system designed to make auto driving safer and more convenient. 

However, this technology has also been at the center of numerous accidents and subsequent legal battles. Can Tesla be held liable for an Autopilot car accident? The legal answer is complex and rapidly evolving. While Tesla has prevailed in some recent court cases, a wave of investigations, lawsuits, and mounting evidence suggests the tide may be turning. 

Contact us if you had an accident involving a Tesla

Autopilot: Advanced Assistance, Not Full Self-Driving Technology

Tesla Autopilot is a sophisticated driver-assistance system (ADAS) that can manage steering, acceleration, and braking on highways under certain conditions. It’s important to remember, however, (and as Tesla emphasizes), that Autopilot does not make vehicles autonomous driving cars. The driver remains legally responsible and must be attentive and ready to take control at a moment’s notice. 

Here’s the breakdown of the current legal landscape surrounding autonomous vehicles, particularly Tesla Autopilot, and potential liability:

  • Recent Court Decisions: In a well-publicized case, juries sided with Tesla, attributing fatal accidents to “classic human error,” not Autopilot malfunction. However, some judges allowed claims for punitive damages against Tesla, citing evidence the company might have been aware of limitations in the technology.
  • NHTSA Scrutiny and Tesla Recall: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is investigating hundreds of Autopilot-related crashes, concerned that Tesla’s driver-monitoring systems may be inadequate and the system’s capabilities overstated. That resulted in a 2023 recall of over 360,000 Autopilot Teslas with Full Self-Driving (FSD) software due to its ability to perform unsafe maneuvers.
  • Mounting Lawsuits Challenge Tesla’s Marketing: A proposed class-action lawsuit accuses FSD Tesla of misleading consumers about Autopilot’s safety and portraying drivers as unwitting “beta testers” of the technology. That highlights a key legal battleground: whether Tesla’s marketing downplays the limitations of Autopilot, potentially contributing to accidents.

Contact our attorney to learn more about your legal options after a car accident

Key Evidence Used in Court

When determining Tesla’s liability in Autopilot crashes, courts analyze various types of self-driving cars evidence:

Internal Communications

Internal Tesla documents and communications can reveal what the company knew about Autopilot’s limitations and whether it was marketed more optimistically than warranted. For instance, a Florida judge found “reasonable evidence” that Tesla executives, including CEO Elon Musk, were aware of Autopilot detecting cross-traffic issues but still promoted the technology as highly capable. 

Driver Warnings and User Agreements

The adequacy of Tesla’s driver warnings and user agreements is another critical area of scrutiny. Some judges have found that Tesla’s manuals and agreements did not properly convey the limitations of Autopilot, potentially leading to a false sense of security among drivers.

Forensic Data

Forensic data from the vehicle involved in a crash can show whether Autopilot was engaged at the time of the accident. Tesla has sometimes argued that extensive damage to data logs makes it impossible to prove Autopilot’s involvement, but plaintiffs have countered this with evidence such as dashboard camera footage.

Expert Analysis

Experts often compare Tesla’s public statements about Autopilot’s capabilities with the actual performance data from the vehicles. This analysis can reveal discrepancies that suggest Tesla’s marketing may have been misleading.

Potential Autopilot Defects

Beyond marketing and driver warnings, courts will also consider evidence of potential flaws within the Autopilot system and self-driving vehicles. This could include hardware malfunctions or software bugs that caused the system to behave unexpectedly. For instance, a case might hinge on whether a faulty sensor led to a missed critical object, contributing to the accident.

The Road Ahead for Tesla’s Liability

While the automated Tesla car has so far enjoyed some legal victories, mounting evidence, investigations, and lawsuits suggest the future might hold more liability for the automaker. If courts find that Tesla knowingly concealed Autopilot’s limitations or that the technology has safety deficiencies, the legal landscape could shift dramatically.

Know Your Rights: Get Legal Help After a Tesla Accident

If you have been involved in a Tesla accident, understanding your legal rights is crucial, especially one where Autopilot was engaged. Navigating complex ADAS liability issues requires experienced legal counsel. Call us today for immediate legal advice at 404-418-8507

Meet James Ponton, an attorney with years of experience in auto crashes lawsuits. He can help you understand your rights and explore potential legal avenues.